An open letter

Maree Bicknell, Manager Corporate Services
Mark Pitt (General Manager), Councilors, Council employees and ratepayers, 
Northern Midlands Council 
13 Smith St. LONGFORD TAS. 7301

18^th of August 2009

 Dear Madam,

~ Possessions – Rightful ownership ~
Ref: Auction of property at 200 Norwich Dr. LONGFORD – ID No: 6747551 – Title No. 125707/4

 I Ken Atherton am in receipt of your extraordinary ‘contradictory’ letter dated 17^th August 2009 (Ref: 24/013 MB) (click to view) wherein it is stated that: “Council has not taken ownership of your property but under the Local Government Act may sell the property as if it was the owner of the land”. This by virtue of a ‘rule/political decree’ written in a book, being: 
Section 137 of the Local Government Act 1993. (No. 95 of 1993), wherein it states ‘sell that land as if it were their own.’

I also refer to a document written by the lawyers appointed by you within which is the auction program and or purchase buy back details, and it clearly states that the ‘Vendor’ is the Northern Midlands Council (NMC).

By now you should realize that I am endeavoring to establish once and for all for all mankind whether or not the citizens of the land are in fact legal owners of their Freehold Title properties, and whether in fact the State Government believes that IT owns everything and that it controls the activities of Council.

 I also wish to establish whether the Council ‘officers’ yourself included are in fact working solely as a community welfare service provider or not and, whether in fact you are simply so ‘stating’ but in reality you are a part of a controlling force that is using your ‘office’ and State Government ‘decrees’ to extort money from the people as you hide behind the façade of a benign community service provider.

 It follows that if I am the “Fee Simple” legal owner of my ‘Title’ deeds then no community organization can expect me to pay any money for the provision of services that I neither asked for nor received.

 It follows that if you now state that you have not ‘confiscated’ my land by appropriation, then you cannot sell it at auction or otherwise giving your name (NMC) as the vendor, for that is a false misrepresentation and that is an illegal activity as no ‘vendor’ can morally sell anything unless they have the consent of the owner.
(Note: ‘moral,’ see note at end of document)

It follows that if you sell it without my permission or with or without your name as the ‘vendor’ that all the ‘persons’ complicit including the ‘auctioneer’ or any ‘bidder’ is guilty in the eyes of man and God of selling stolen property that has been acquired under false pretences.

 If follows that it is now incumbent upon you to establish and state who has ‘rightful ownership’ of the said property prior to selling it, for by this letter I am advising you and everyone in the community that at no time have I ever asked you to sell my property, as it is not for sale.

It is now the time for everyone to find out a few facts, one if the supposed community service provider (NMC) is operating under a false set of ‘rules’ that are forcing ‘our’ employees to act in a very underhand manner to the detriment of their own souls, and I certainly would not wish to be complicit to funding their wages, hence my stand today.

 I certainly believe that ‘we’ the community need the provision of services, so I am not against any ‘body’ or ‘Council’ of wise elders being established under a truly ‘benign’ mandate, being one whereby ‘we’ the community do not expect nor demand that our employees ‘resume, seize, confiscate or take possession of the ‘Title’ deeds of other community members for any reason.

If you ‘sell me up’ legally in your minds or otherwise, then you and everyone complicit will surely be ‘dispossessed’ of your ‘right’ to enter the promised land of Heaven, for that is a FACT backed by the Might of God’s Holy Word, for ‘thieves’ and extortionists are automatically ‘barred’ from entry to that sacred place where NO person ever wields a ‘mace’ against others.

 You now need to establish whether the ‘rule’ you are using against me, (Section 37 of the Local Government Act) is applicable in my case.

 You also now need to establish whether IT is superseded by the mandate granted to the ‘enforcers’ you use to back up your ‘claims,’ for within the superior Constitutional powers of the Tasmanian institution of government that you appear to ‘serve,’ there is the following RULE:

Tasmania Constitution Act 1934 (No. 94 of 1934)
PART V – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Religious freedom

46. (1) Freedom of conscience and the free profession and practice of religion are, subject to public order and morality, guaranteed to every citizen.

(2) No person shall be subject to any disability, - - - on account of his religion or religious belief - - .

This rule supersedes all other rules raised up by anyone, being the freedom for ‘me’ to NOT fund any institution that according to my religious ‘belief,’ conflicts with my ideology as does yours, and as I am an absolute pacifist I cannot support, condone, nor fund your “council’ institution in its contra and present ‘controlling and punitive’ code of conduct ways.

 I am sending a copy of your letter to the auctioneers appointed by you, for they now need to be made aware of the fact that you have stated in your letter that you (NMC) are not the ‘owners’ as such, quote: (Council has not taken ownership of your property) and thus it would be very unwise and inappropriate of them to become complicit to the proposed sale of MY freehold Title land by selling IT on your behalf.

 As I see it, you cannot ‘shilly shally’ around stating that you have not seized my land and ITS Title deeds, for if that is FACT then you cannot sell it.  If you as said have been granted the ‘powers’ to sell it “As IF you were the owner” simply because an ‘obscure’ ignominious rule appears legitimate then you are deluded and, why would you even try and use IT against a community member?

 You cannot ‘act’ as if you were the owner; you have either seized IT my land by ‘confiscation’ and now claim IT as now being your possession or you have not confiscated it.  If you have not confiscated it then you cannot sell it ‘as if it were your own’ to sell.

 The people of this and every land are awaiting to see IF they have NO ‘rights of ownership’ due to their ‘rates’ charges actually being an annual ‘hut’ tax rental payment to the earthly sovereign (Institutions of government) or otherwise. 

 Why do I say this? Because if a person can have their land seized by confiscation for non-payment of annually increasing monetary demands backed by forceful eviction, it means THAT THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS of ownership solely due to a ‘ruling’ by someone that was hidden in a text book.  

For if it is not an annual rental ‘tax’ payment then I have NO obligation to pay for services that were not provided and, I have NO obligation to ask for services I do not need and, if it is NOT an annual ‘hut tax’ rental payment (see note below), then you should not seize my property as payment of false debts, for I did not ask for the provision of services and neither have you ‘listed’ the services which you are claiming payment.

 As I see it, if ‘council staff’ can ‘legally’ self-empower themselves to make fiscal demands upon community members and force them off their property for non-conformity, then it is time to expose this fact so that THE PEOPLE can decide whether to keep on supporting and funding iniquity or whether to as me, walk apart from it.

 As I see it, there is no requirement by God or me to ‘settle’ with you for ‘debts’ that I did not accrue.  If by ‘act’ of disservice to me and the community you take the extraordinary ‘step’ of auctioning my property then so be it.

 For by this act you are telling the local and world community that for non payment of an ‘extortionists’ monetary demand, you take it upon yourself to either:

1 - Personally banished a person from their home that you sold to another, or
2 – Coerced them into ‘bidding’ for it on the open market so as to not ‘lose all.’

 And, in either ‘case,’ every ‘ratepayer’ in the community becomes complicit to the ‘costs’ or loss suffered by my family as well as all mental or emotional trauma endured by your ‘attack’ upon us being my family and, will suffer the same within the immutable Law of God “As you or your servants do unto others will be done unto you.”

 As my sole intent is to bring about positive change and assist everyone, I have stated that in order to so do and to also ‘minimise’ my ‘losses’ and your ‘accrual’ of painful karmic dues within God’s law, that:

 1 – You withdraw or ‘cancel’ your demands of me. 
 Or,
2 – You accept that as you have already advertised my property for open sale by auction on 21^st  August with your name as ‘vendor,’ that if I make a pre-auction ‘bid’ that your receipt of monies I pay you in order to finalize the purchase must state;

Received from K. Atherton    $…

Being the full purchase price for property at 200 Norwich drive, LONGFORD;

ID No: 6747551 – Title No; 125707/4

 Or;
 3 – Because, if the property goes to auction, whosoever purchases the property will require from the NMC/auctioneer/your solicitor, a receipt detailing the real property description of said property that will also need to be placed upon the sale contract made by Shields Heritage upon which the NMC is listed as the vendor.

 The purchaser will also require transfer of Title forms signed by myself or the NMC in order to make the transfer a legal document, and to enable the new owner to obtain Title Deeds.

 In the event that you accept pre-auction purchase settlement as per (2) above then there is no need of any Title transfer documentation as the property remains in my name.

For your interest I give the below:

PROPERTY RIGHTS in AUSTRALIA

Australia is a Common Law country, and property-owners have rights at law, particularly through the High Court ruling by Mr. Justice Kirby in September 1998. Property owners whose land is held under Deeds in Fee Simple have the right to refuse to agree to the takeover of their land for this or any other purpose.

Private Property Owners and their Rights:

Property Owners’ Rights in Australia are guaranteed in three ways by three different legal instruments, as under…

(1) Deeds in Fee Simple
(2) Magna Carta 1215, and
(3) The Bill of Rights 1688/9

Fee Simple rights, particularly the High Court ruling given by Mr Justice Kirby, in September, 1998, when he made his decision by using an earlier High Court case (1923) when Mr. Justice Isaacs settled a dispute by confirming to the property owner in the case the rights conferred on all property-owners under their Freehold Deeds in Fee Simple.

Under the current laws in Australia, both State and Federal, it is absolutely illegal for the Government "to take what it wants", or indeed to dictate in any way what property-owners must do or not do in regard to their lands held under Deeds in Fee Simple so long as we retain our Common Law status under our legally unchangeable Christian Monarchical Constitutions, which apply both State and Federally.

Mr. Justice Kirby states: "Certain politicians are trying illegally to change our unchangeable (except via referendum) Federal Constitution, because they want to deny people the right to hold private property under our Monarchical laws." Reference: property rights

Sincerely

Ken Atherton
200 Norwich Drive
LONGFORD TAS.

PS A copy of this letter will ahead be on line as letter 47 added to the pre-existing 46 letters to council at: (www.pindariherbfarm.com./ratelet/ratelist.htm

 Note: ‘hut tax’ rental payment – From days of old until today the earthly ‘sovereign’ assumed ownership in perpetuity of all lands that he and his ‘institution’ possessed by force of arms, and all citizens were/are forced to pay a ‘hut tax’ rental or be banished from society and sent into the wilderness to live as a ‘Gypsy’ owning no land. (Real Estate)

 Note: Moral: Any ruling or activity of man that is in contravention of God’s Command:
"Go your way in peace and love one another and be merciful, compassionate and forgiving."

- Which automatically places that person within the punitive aspect of God’s Law:
"As you or your servants do unto others will be done to you by others, be it benign or malignant."

 It is time for everyone to wake up to the fact that any person finding the justification to use force against another WILL be corrected by God within God’s Law and will be deserving of all their suffering. I can only hope and trust that all will make an effort and bow in conformity to God’s Command

Home